MySQL locking and MVCC mechanisms
The concept of transactions and ACID characteristics
Transactions are a core concept in any database operation. Transactions refer to a set of ordered database operations as a unit. These operations are either executed all or not, ensuring the integrity and consistency of the data. Transactions in MySQL must follow ACID principles, namely atomicity, consistency, isolation, and persistence. Atomicity ensures that all operations within a transaction are executed as a whole; consistency means that the transaction transitions the database from one consistent state to another; isolation ensures that concurrent transactions do not interfere with each other; persistence promises that once the transaction is completed, the result will be permanent.
For example, during the bank transfer process, the two actions of deducting money from Account A and adding money to Account B need to be handled as an atomic transaction. If one of the operations fails, the entire transaction will be rolled back to maintain the consistency of the data.
The type of lock and its working mechanism
MySQL supports a variety of types of locks, including table-level locks, row-level locks, and intent locks. Table-level locking is a coarse-grained locking mechanism, which locks the entire table, suitable for situations where more reads and fewer writes. Row-level locks are more refined, locking only the data rows involved, improving concurrency performance, and are especially suitable for high concurrency application scenarios. An intent lock is a special lock that indicates that a transaction intends to lock a specific range of data rows, thereby avoiding unnecessary scans of the range by other transactions.
Take the InnoDB storage engine as an example, when we execute it
SELECT * FROM table_name WHERE id=10 FOR UPDATE;
When MySQL adds an exclusive lock to the row that meets the conditions, preventing other transactions from modifying the data of the row until the current transaction ends.
The impact of the particle size and performance of the lock
Choosing the right locking strategy is crucial to optimizing system performance. The larger the locking particle size, the smaller the system overhead, but the lower the concurrency; on the contrary, the finer the locking particle size, although it increases management costs, it can improve concurrency processing capabilities. Therefore, when designing applications, the relationship between the two should be balanced according to actual business needs.
For example, on an e-commerce platform, product inventory updates are a frequent and sensitive operation. Using row-level locks can effectively reduce the lock range, improve order processing speed, and ensure accurate inventory information.
Multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) principle
MVCC is one of the powerful tools for MySQL to achieve efficient concurrent reading and writing. By maintaining different versions of data snapshots for each transaction, even if multiple transactions access the same data at the same time, it is guaranteed that each of them sees the latest or pre-commit status. Specifically, MVCC combines non-locked reads (snapshot reads) and locked reads (current reads), the former allowing transactions to read versions of data that are not locked by other transactions, while the latter ensures that the latest version of data is read and may lock them.
Consider a scenario like this:
One user is viewing the product details page, and another user places an order to purchase the same product.
With the help of MVCC, users who view the details page will continue to see the original information of the product, and the transactions of the user who place the order will be processed based on the latest inventory information.
Illusion reading problem and solution
Phantom reading refers to the phenomenon that when transaction A reads a record within a certain range, transaction B inserts a new record, causing a "phantom" record to appear when querying again. To solve this problem, InnoDB adopts the Next-Key Lock strategy, a way to combine row locks and gap locks. It prevents other transactions from inserting new records between two existing records, thereby preventing the occurrence of phantom reading.
For example, if we have a table containing a list of products, when a transaction is undergoing a paging query, Next-Key Lock can ensure that even if new products are added, it will not affect the result set displayed on the current page.
Deadlock detection and prevention strategies
Deadlocks are problems that may arise when concurrent transactions compete for resources. A deadlock is formed when two or more transactions are waiting for each other to release resources. MySQL has a built-in deadlock detection mechanism, which can automatically choose to sacrifice a transaction to resolve the deadlock after a deadlock is discovered. However, in order to avoid frequent occurrence of this, developers should take some precautions, such as shortening the transaction duration as much as possible, acquiring locks in a certain order, etc.
Imagine two users trying to buy the same item that is about to be sold out almost at the same time, which may lead to a deadlock due to a scramble for inventory. Through reasonable programming practices, we can reduce this risk and ensure a smooth user experience.
The impact of transaction isolation level on locks and MVCC
The SQL standard defines four transaction isolation levels: Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read and Serializable. Different isolation levels determine the inter-transaction visibility rules and the behavior changes of locks. For example, at the read committed level, a transaction can only see the committed data, while at the repeatable read level, a transaction can see a consistent view of the data throughout its life. MVCC further enhances concurrency performance on this basis, especially in environments with high isolation levels.
Lock optimization techniques in practical application scenarios
In actual project development, we often encounter various lock-related challenges. To deal with these problems, in addition to correctly configuring the transaction isolation level, technical means such as batch processing and asynchronous task decomposition can also be used to reduce the probability of lock conflict. In addition, rational use of indexes can also significantly improve query efficiency and indirectly reduce lock holding time. Finally, for long transactions that are really unavoidable, stress can be relieved by adjusting MySQL configuration parameters or optimizing application logic.
For example, when building a social media platform, the like function involves a large number of concurrent requests, and the above methods can effectively improve the response time and user experience.
Summarize
The above is personal experience. I hope you can give you a reference and I hope you can support me more.