The author bought the entry-level computer in the Spring Festival in 2001 and the configuration is very low. The CPU is Cyron 700m, 64m memory, 20g hard disk, integrated graphics card, sound card motherboard, and the system is win98. It is okay to write articles. When you go online, you need to have the patience to wait. When you use larger software such as acdsee, you will go on strike from time to time, which makes me embarrassed. I often cause trouble because of trial and update of various software. So at that time, one of my main learning directions was how to backup, restore and reinstall the system. After I was able to work proficiently, I wanted to upgrade the computer, but the motherboard level was too low, so it was impossible to make a bigger improvement. Unless the whole machine started over, I could only make a small move, upgraded the memory to 256m at one time, expanded the hard drive to 40g, and installed the system into win98 and winxp dual systems to backup each other to improve the safety. After trying it, it could actually drive Windows XP, but it consumed more than half of the memory as soon as it was turned on, so the situation of running large software such as acdsee and photoshop has not improved much, and it is of course even more unsatisfactory to play 3D games. At this time, I tried Windows Optimization Master and received significant results. It is mainly reflected in three aspects:
1. Automatic optimization works, and the machine is much easier to use;
2. Cleaning up garbage and redundant files reduces the system burden, which is very useful for low-configuration computers;
3. What works more is real-time memory sorting. When running photoshop, the memory often drops to 0. The computer pretends to die and slacket off. However, with the help of the optimization master, it can slowly recover. No matter what, it can finally be used.
In this way, with the support of the Optimization Master, I went through the initial stage of learning to use the computer with this low-configuration computer and learned a lot of things. Therefore, I trust and love the Optimization Master very much. It can be said that I always stay together and cannot be without this man for a day.
Today, two and a half years later, computer technology is becoming increasingly advanced, and software and hardware have developed to a new level. I made up my mind to "retire" the old machine that has worked hard and made great contributions and let the virtuous give it to the new machine. Today my configuration is: cpu p4 2.4gc, motherboard i865pe, memory 2x256m ddr400, hard disk 120g, graphics card ati radeon 9700, lcd and crt dual-head display, and a movie and television card is also installed, and broadband Internet access. Although it cannot be called luxurious, it is enough to meet the level of a quasi-graphic workstation.
Because my optimization master complex is very strong, I registered and installed the optimization master again, but the actual application effect is very different from before. I first used the "system performance test" of the Optimizer to test it. The total performance score of the entire machine before and after the Optimizer's automatic optimization is about 103 points (I have used the optimization function that comes with winxp in advance to adjust the entire machine to the best performance), which shows that the Optimizer's role in the optimization of such a high-configuration computer is already optional and does not play a big role. I still set up the real-time memory sorting function, but from running photoshop to check, the available memory is always stable at around 55%, without obvious fluctuations, and the phenomenon of fake death no longer occurs, which means that the real-time memory sorting is not set. On the contrary, I encountered several "new crises":
1. In the past, when I used optimization masters to perform automatic optimization, I positioned myself as a "windows standard user". This time I want to change it and position myself as a "large software user" to see if it is more beneficial to running photoshop. Unexpectedly, this test caused a big mess, and it crashed immediately after restarting. It couldn't even start "start", let alone use Windows or Optimization Master to restore the system. Fortunately, I used ghost for backup in advance, and using this "super trick" is considered rebirth in a desperate situation.
2. There is an option in the "Disk Cache Optimization" of the Optimizer: "Enable large system cache (memory recommendation above 256m)". I was once warned by "Insufficient cache", and now the memory has increased to 512m, so I checked it by "Recommended". The result is another mess: many common software cannot be started, including the optimization master himself. Fortunately, the "start" was as usual, and I used the "system restore" function to restore normality.
3. On September 23, pconline published an article: "Correctly configure CPU level 2 cache in Windows XP", and there is a paragraph that says: "Using Windows Optimization Master can also set CPU level 2 cache correctly: Start Windows Optimization Master, select "System Performance Optimization", in "File System Optimization", the top is the settings item about CPU level 2 cache. After dragging the slider to the corresponding position, save the settings and restart the computer." I used Optimizer to automatically optimize and check "System Performance Optimization" and found that the slider of "Level 2 Data Advanced Cache" is still in zero position, and I still moved it to the 201 position as stated. Unexpectedly, "It is better to have no books than to believe in books." After turning on the computer, I couldn't even get the windows screen. First, some changing lines similar to defragmentation, and then the black screen, and I couldn't do anything, which made me scratch my ears and cheeks, helpless. After thinking hard, I bet all my money. When you restart, click the "f8" key and the "safe mode" was successfully started. So you used the "system restore" function to rescue it, and escaped another disaster.
From these "blood lessons" I realize that there are three taboos for optimizing high-configuration computers using optimization masters:
1. Do not position yourself as a "large software user" at will;
2. Do not select “Use large cache” at will;
3. Do not adjust the CPU level 2 cache arbitrarily. Related to this is: when adjusting cache in Windows' "System", from the "Start", "Control Panel", "System", "Advanced", "Performance Settings", and "Advanced", you can only select "Programs", and "System Cache" cannot be selected, otherwise the same phenomenon in the second taboo mentioned above will occur, and the system must be restored to restore.
From the above, we can see that the role that Windows Optimizer can play in high-configuration computers is far less than that of low-configuration computers. This is completely understandable, and it should be not misused. However, the role of optimization masters in system performance testing, garbage and redundant file cleaning is still very useful. They are a valuable optimization software
1. Automatic optimization works, and the machine is much easier to use;
2. Cleaning up garbage and redundant files reduces the system burden, which is very useful for low-configuration computers;
3. What works more is real-time memory sorting. When running photoshop, the memory often drops to 0. The computer pretends to die and slacket off. However, with the help of the optimization master, it can slowly recover. No matter what, it can finally be used.
In this way, with the support of the Optimization Master, I went through the initial stage of learning to use the computer with this low-configuration computer and learned a lot of things. Therefore, I trust and love the Optimization Master very much. It can be said that I always stay together and cannot be without this man for a day.
Today, two and a half years later, computer technology is becoming increasingly advanced, and software and hardware have developed to a new level. I made up my mind to "retire" the old machine that has worked hard and made great contributions and let the virtuous give it to the new machine. Today my configuration is: cpu p4 2.4gc, motherboard i865pe, memory 2x256m ddr400, hard disk 120g, graphics card ati radeon 9700, lcd and crt dual-head display, and a movie and television card is also installed, and broadband Internet access. Although it cannot be called luxurious, it is enough to meet the level of a quasi-graphic workstation.
Because my optimization master complex is very strong, I registered and installed the optimization master again, but the actual application effect is very different from before. I first used the "system performance test" of the Optimizer to test it. The total performance score of the entire machine before and after the Optimizer's automatic optimization is about 103 points (I have used the optimization function that comes with winxp in advance to adjust the entire machine to the best performance), which shows that the Optimizer's role in the optimization of such a high-configuration computer is already optional and does not play a big role. I still set up the real-time memory sorting function, but from running photoshop to check, the available memory is always stable at around 55%, without obvious fluctuations, and the phenomenon of fake death no longer occurs, which means that the real-time memory sorting is not set. On the contrary, I encountered several "new crises":
1. In the past, when I used optimization masters to perform automatic optimization, I positioned myself as a "windows standard user". This time I want to change it and position myself as a "large software user" to see if it is more beneficial to running photoshop. Unexpectedly, this test caused a big mess, and it crashed immediately after restarting. It couldn't even start "start", let alone use Windows or Optimization Master to restore the system. Fortunately, I used ghost for backup in advance, and using this "super trick" is considered rebirth in a desperate situation.
2. There is an option in the "Disk Cache Optimization" of the Optimizer: "Enable large system cache (memory recommendation above 256m)". I was once warned by "Insufficient cache", and now the memory has increased to 512m, so I checked it by "Recommended". The result is another mess: many common software cannot be started, including the optimization master himself. Fortunately, the "start" was as usual, and I used the "system restore" function to restore normality.
3. On September 23, pconline published an article: "Correctly configure CPU level 2 cache in Windows XP", and there is a paragraph that says: "Using Windows Optimization Master can also set CPU level 2 cache correctly: Start Windows Optimization Master, select "System Performance Optimization", in "File System Optimization", the top is the settings item about CPU level 2 cache. After dragging the slider to the corresponding position, save the settings and restart the computer." I used Optimizer to automatically optimize and check "System Performance Optimization" and found that the slider of "Level 2 Data Advanced Cache" is still in zero position, and I still moved it to the 201 position as stated. Unexpectedly, "It is better to have no books than to believe in books." After turning on the computer, I couldn't even get the windows screen. First, some changing lines similar to defragmentation, and then the black screen, and I couldn't do anything, which made me scratch my ears and cheeks, helpless. After thinking hard, I bet all my money. When you restart, click the "f8" key and the "safe mode" was successfully started. So you used the "system restore" function to rescue it, and escaped another disaster.
From these "blood lessons" I realize that there are three taboos for optimizing high-configuration computers using optimization masters:
1. Do not position yourself as a "large software user" at will;
2. Do not select “Use large cache” at will;
3. Do not adjust the CPU level 2 cache arbitrarily. Related to this is: when adjusting cache in Windows' "System", from the "Start", "Control Panel", "System", "Advanced", "Performance Settings", and "Advanced", you can only select "Programs", and "System Cache" cannot be selected, otherwise the same phenomenon in the second taboo mentioned above will occur, and the system must be restored to restore.
From the above, we can see that the role that Windows Optimizer can play in high-configuration computers is far less than that of low-configuration computers. This is completely understandable, and it should be not misused. However, the role of optimization masters in system performance testing, garbage and redundant file cleaning is still very useful. They are a valuable optimization software